individual whose interests are involved on the other side of the
material transactions that took place with Mr Tchigirinski and his
companies is Mr Anatoly Kruglov . Between 1991 and 1998, Mr Kruglov
was head of the Russian Federation's State Customs Committee, and his
family was involved in the ownership of a number of Russian customs
terminals (which were privately owned, subject to state supervision). As
head of the family, Mr Kruglov assumed responsibility for management of
the family's money. By 1999, that money amounted to a very substantial
fund, although there is no suggestion that Mr Kruglov and his family
were wealthy on the scale of Mr Tchigirinski. Neither the question
whether that fund all belonged beneficially to Mr Kruglov or was partly
the property of his children, nor the source of the money, is relevant
to the issues in these proceedings, and I shall refer to the fund simply
as "the Kruglov money". What is very relevant is that Mr Kruglov also
engaged Mr Haener, starting around mid-1999, to invest and manage the
Kruglov money. Mr Haener carried out that task with the benefit of
various powers of attorney granted to him. Initially, the Kruglov money
was transferred to be held by some Liechtenstein foundations, but they
were dissolved in 2006.
Круглов, возглавлявший в90-е Государственный таможенный комитет,
добился влондонском суде решения овозврате кредитов надесятки
4.A curious but significant feature of
this case is that not only was there no direct contact at any time
between Mr Kruglov and Mr Tchigirinski, but that each was unaware, until
well after the material events had occurred, of the involvement of the
other in the various transactions concerning their respective interests.
Indeed, Mr Kruglov said that although in general he was not concerned
how Mr Haener invested the Kruglov money (provided that it was secure
and obtained a good return), if he had known that his money was being
lent, directly or indirectly, to Mr Tchigirinski he would never have
agreed to that
Хорошо, что есть на свете лондонский суд.
немного унизительно, что жулики, напилилившие деньги здесь, так
откровенно и открыто делят их там, ни капли не стесняясь. Типа, дикий
народ, чего на них оглядываться. Дадим им водки и балалайку.
Но хоть так.
Любопытно, вот против Развозжаева возбудили дело из-за того, что он, якобы, 500 шапок у кого-то отнял 15 лет назал
, а для Круглова эти раскрытые и документально доказанные факты коррупции будут иметь какие-то последствия?